Individual experimentation
- private prompts and inconsistent tool use
- large unreviewable diffs
- unclear privacy and source-code boundaries
- managers cannot tell what is working
AI coding agent adoption for professional software teams
Mostly Harmless Code helps engineering organizations turn AI coding tools from individual experiments into repeatable team workflows: scoped tasks, test-backed changes, review discipline, and practical security boundaries.
$ codex "triage flaky auth tests"
reading repo context...
found failing path: session refresh edge case
$ claude "prepare minimal patch with tests"
patch ready: 3 files, 2 tests added
review: security boundary unchanged
The enterprise problem
Training products
For CTOs, VPs, directors, and enablement leaders deciding how to roll out AI coding tools.
Hands-on training for professional developers using Claude Code and Codex on realistic repo tasks.
A deeper engagement that helps teams apply the workflow to their own codebase and delivery process.
Curriculum map
Tool model, context windows, repo navigation, task decomposition, agent limits.
Bug triage, test repair, refactoring, code review preparation, documentation updates.
Secrets, IP, dependencies, generated code review, audit habits, team policy.
Cycle time, review quality, test evidence, rework, developer confidence.
Deep pairing sessions, broad refactors, interactive repo work, local planning.
Shared engineering discipline
Task execution, automation, codebase navigation, tests, review-ready changes.
Enterprise readiness
Training covers secrets handling, repo boundaries, customer data, tool permissions, and review obligations.
Leaders get a practical adoption model: what to measure, which teams to pilot, and how to avoid cargo-cult usage.
Clear formats, delivery modes, prerequisites, cancellation terms, and NDA-friendly training options.
Exercises focus on patches, tests, reviews, and system understanding rather than generic chatbot demos.
Rollout roadmap
Map teams, current tool use, repo constraints, and policy concerns.
Run workshop with one or two teams and gather workflow evidence.
Publish team playbook, review expectations, and safe usage rules.
Train champions, expand by team type, and measure delivery impact.
Prototype stack decision
Best for fast iteration on message, diagrams, offer structure, and executive polish.
Best when articles, reusable layouts, RSS, tags, and SEO metadata become regular work.
Best if the website grows into a product surface with forms, dashboards, auth, or dynamic data.
Next step
The launch version will use Google Workspace for business mail at hello@mostlyharmlesscode.com and a dedicated booking link once the scheduling account is created.